While this mentorship program may share some common goals of bootcamps, I believe we are starkly different.
My very first success story with the mentorship program was from a finance guy who decided to chase his dream of breaking in to tech. Before hiring me, he was a bootcamp grad from one of the most popular and trusted bootcamps. Even as a good student he found himself jobless 2 years after graduation. 90 days after working with me he learned how to actually code and interview, landing his first offer in tech as a product engineer.
In my 10 years of software development and creating software training I have seen some common themes with the rise of bootcamps:
Bootcamps are often mass-scale programs with little to no customization. They overcharge and under deliver.
Bootcamps lead with content, focusing on a table of contents of things you'll learn. To me, this makes most bootcamps just a glorified course. At CodeBreakthrough we lead with custom 1:1 mentoring and small group calls for Q&A. Our learning modules are just a bonus.
Bootcamps focus on the wrong tech and skills, either too shallow, too broad, or not valuable.
Bootcamps lead students astray either deceptively or without consideration of what is truly needed in the job market. I've found that many full stack bootcamps are actually 70% frontend with 30% Node and MongoDB sprinkled in. This is why there are so many awful full stack devs out there who can't land roles. At CodeBreakthrough, we flip this. We're more like 70% backend (what actually powers and runs apps) and 30% frontend.
Bootcamps prioritize standards and copy-paste curriculums instead of teaching people to utilize their unique strengths and interests to give them an unfair advantage.
Bootcamps often fudge their success numbers by giving grueling standards to each student to even be considered in their success data.
Bootcamps measure success by measuring a few limited metrics for an entire cohort instead of customized goal setting for each person they work with.
Bootcamps are cohort based, forcing everyone to progress at the same pace. This causes individuals to either progress at a pace too slow for them, or a pace too fast for them forcing them to fall behind or completely fail out.
Bootcamps structure their programs strangely, often requiring you to give up your life for a few weeks or months to study (unreasonable for most people), or alternatively requiring you to slave through material part time for extremely long periods of time. I've even seen bootcamps marketing how long it takes their students to go through the material, as if requiring a year+ is a good thing. I've found that with the right strategies you can make life-changing progress in 90 days without sacrificing your current career or personal life.
Bootcamps waste your time. They often teach you irrelevant stuff, go at the wrong pace, take too long, or require major life changes to succeed (such as leaving a job to do a bootcamp, which is actually pretty dumb). In the CodeBreakthrough mentorship we prioritize efficient learning. Time is money, so we don't want you wasting your time anymore than we would want you to waste our time.
Bootcamps often offer "refund guarantees" with little-to-no chance of actually getting a refund if you're unhappy or don't get the result you want.
Bootcamps commonly utilize marketing gimmicks and false guarantees to give people false confidence they'll be successful, when what the mentee really needs is caring but direct, firm guidance.
Bootcamps prioritize students' feelings over students' results. My job as a mentor is to fight for you and actually help you, so If I'm not happy with your work and effort you better believe I will tell you.
Bootcamps prioritize learning specific programming languages and buzzwords over teaching people how to be software engineers and solve problems beyond their standard curriculum.
Bootcamps provide very general career guidance from career coaches. This guidance is usually bad or useless.
Bootcamps have built a bad reputation. The low quality outcomes, slow decline of quality standards, and assembly line approach to producing software engineers has lead to a collapse in the quality of software development talent. What if going through a bootcamp could actually hurt your chances of landing a role due to this reputation? Yikes.
Bootcamps are expensive (often $10K-$20K). But the true cost is not in the total price tag, it's in the awful value they provide and the false confidence they give students. So sure, go through a bootcamp if you enjoy burning cash.
Before you call me out and tell me how great a certain bootcamp is, I understand that not all bootcamps are built equal. But there are fundamental design flaws, approaches, and marketing gimmicks in many.